Harmony Tan vs En Shuo Liang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 09 Jul at 03:43 PM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

H. Tan vs E. Shuo Liang

Harmony Tan
Harmony Tan

Flag FRA FRA

w
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
En Shuo Liang
En Shuo Liang

Flag TPE TPE

w
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
w
l

0

Win

1

Played

1

Win

28
Age
25
-
Height
-
220
C. Rank
354
90
Best Rank
150
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$638.7K
Career Money
$265.8K
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Tan 0 - 1 Liang

They have played 2 sets in total, with Harmony Tan winning 0 and En Shuo Liang winning 2. The last match between En Shuo Liang and Harmony Tan was at the W50 Corroios-Seixal, 09-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with En Shuo Liang getting the victory 7-6(3) 7-5.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Tan0
Liang1
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1W50 Corroios-Seixal(07-09-25)

Hard
TPE Flag
En Shuo Liang
7
7
FRA Flag
Harmony Tan
6
5

H. Tan vs E. S. Liang H2H Profile

Stats
$638,698Career Prize Money$265,799
55.71% (395-314)Career Total W/L53.14% (203-179)
0Hard1
12Titles1
0Total H2H Matches1
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

H. Tan vs E. S. Liang Match Preview:

  • When comparing second serve performance over the last six months, Tan edges past Liang, securing 41.2% of points versus 40.14% for Liang.
  • On the return, Liang slightly outperforms Tan with 50.77% of opponent's second serve points won, while Tan capitalizes on 49.55%.
  • Can first serve return statistics impact match forecasts? Liang appears to have an advantage here, achieving 31.24% compared to Tan's 29%.
  • In high-pressure situations like breakpoints, which player shows more resilience? Liang shows a better breakpoint save percentage at 55.28% over Tan's 47.89%.
  • As for overall performance in the past year, Liang retains a slight lead with a 57.69% match win rate, while Tan records 54.39%.
  • Both players excel most on grass, yet Tan has a superior win percentage of 63% compared to Liang's 55% on this surface.
  • Playing conditions factor in; in the last year, Liang has faced higher-ranked opponents with an average of 211.98 compared to Tan's 347.84.
  • In deciding sets, an edge is seen for Liang, winning 56% of these scenarios, while Tan trails at 53%.
  • Considering break-point conversions, Liang converts more effectively at 39.02% compared to Tan’s 34.48%.

Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent trends, Liang displays a marginally stronger performance in crucial areas like breakpoint conversion and first serve returns. Although Tan has showcased a marginally better history on grass surfaces, Liang's overall form against higher-ranked opponents provides them an edge in adaptability.

Additionally, Liang's slightly superior performance in pressure situations, such as saving break points, suggests stronger mental fortitude, which can be pivotal in tight match situations.

In light of these performance indicators, Liang is positioned as the likely victor in the forthcoming match, owing to their slight but consistent advantages across several critical gameplay statistics.

Harmony Tan vs En Shuo Liang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

H. Tan vs E. S. Liang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
0H2H Matches Won1
0Sets Won2
11Games Won14
6Aces (Total)1
4Total Double Faults2
1:20:51Average Match Time1:20:51
53% (32/60)1st Serve %56% (37/66)
66% (21/32)1st Serve Win %73% (27/37)
46% (13/28)2nd Serve Win %48% (14/29)
40% (2/5)Break Pts Won %25% (2/8)
38% (25/66)Return Points Win %43% (26/60)
0% (0/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Won Match100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Tan 48%, Liang 44%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Tan 56%, Liang 55%.
Break Points Saved %: Tan 57%, Liang 55%.

H. Tan Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardW35 Liberec - 03-11-2025

F

JPNM. Aikawa
W
6-2 6-1

SF

UKRV. Podrez
W
7-6(0) 6-2

QF

ROUE. Ruxandra
W
6-3 7-5

R2

CZEL. Havlickova
W
7-6(5) 5-7 6-4

R1

CZED. Hindova
W
6-0 1-0 ret.

E. S. Liang Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardW100 Takasaki - 17-11-2025

R2

JPNH. Sakatsume
L
6-0 6-4

R1

JPNY. Kitahara
W
6-1 6-3
HardJingshan Tennis Open - Jingshan - 22-09-2025

QF

AUST. Gibson
L
3-6 6-4 6-0

R2

JPNK. Okamura
W
7-5 6-1

R1

FRAC. Monnet
W
4-6 6-2 6-1
banner

H. Tan vs E. S. Liang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
55.71% (395/314)YTD Win/Loss53.14% (203/179)
55.58% (881/704)Sets Win/Loss53.39% (472/412)
52.73% (7367/6605)Games Win/Loss51.88% (4199/3894)
56.47% (131/101)Hard Win/Loss55.06% (147/120)
50.39% (130/128)Clay Win/Loss40.82% (20/29)
60.85% (115/74)Indoor Hard W/L54.35% (25/21)
63.33% (19/11)Grass Win/Loss55.00% (11/9)
0.17Aces Per Game0.2
1124Aces Total792
0.18Double Faults Per Game0.29
1233Total Double Faults1156
1:13:46Average Match Time1:30:23
493.09Average Opponent Rank441.41
58% (21337/36831)1st Serve %59% (14801/24931)
63% (13410/21337)1st Serve Win %64% (9428/14801)
46% (7083/15494)2nd Serve Win %48% (4832/10130)
50% (2285/4586)Break Points Won % (Total)46% (1372/2981)
46% (16631/35786)Return Points Win %44% (11023/24792)
38.89% (14/22)Slam W/L42.11% (8/11)
44.44% (4/5)Masters W/L66.67% (6/3)
0.00% (0/1)Cups W/L42.86% (3/4)
42.62% (26/35)Main Tour W/L46.81% (22/25)
56.17% (255/199)Challenger W/L53.79% (149/128)
64.86% (96/52)Futures W/L65.22% (15/8)
57% (388/683)Best of 3 Sets Win %54% (201/373)
10% (1/10)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/2)
53% (63/120)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)52% (45/87)
49% (86/175)Deciding Set Win %47% (59/125)
86% (399/345)1st Set Won, Won Match85% (197/167)
13% (399/52)1st Set Won, Lost Match15% (197/30)
16% (309/49)1st Set Lost, Won Match19% (185/36)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Mon, 01 Dec, 07:00 AM
Prediction
INDD. Munim
INDA. Venkataraman
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
Mon, 01 Dec, 09:00 AM
Prediction
NEDF. V. Donselaar
INDT. Ghildyal
W1
1.21
W2
3.84
Mon, 01 Dec, 07:00 AM
Prediction
INDA. Lakshmanan
INDA. Mehra
W1
1.38
W2
2.76
Mon, 01 Dec, 08:00 AM
Prediction
INDD. Kodancha
INDC. Warik
W1
2.58
W2
1.43
Mon, 01 Dec, 09:00 AM
Prediction
INDU. Kamboj
INDA. V. Duddupudi
W1
1.22
W2
3.74